Home Updates History Blogs Portfolio FAQ Contact Terms Of Use
 
2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017
2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  2025  2026  2027
2028  2029  2030  2031  2032  2033  2034  2035  2036  2037
 
 
 
Are Casual Games the Place to be in the Games Industry?
 
December 10, 2008
By Eric M. Scharf
 

Casual games development provides a simultaneous boost to personal and professional benefits, unlike any other sector of the games industry. As a person who is married and has a family, I have personally experienced the scheduling flexibility that also comes with casual games development. Overtimeno matter the genre or hardware platform is rare and, typically, more than reasonable. The purposeful limitations in complexity and number of "moving parts" within a casual games production cycle dictate this result.

 

Casual games are, in fact, the rarest of all popular game types, because they succeed in spite of the quality and size of the available workforce. Though anyone will tell you that they prefer to work with the best and the brightest, casual game developers do not require top-quality talent to deliver top-quality products. Though anyone will tell you that they would prefer to be developing games with an operational cash surplus, most casual game projects require minuscule funding in comparison to almost any other mainstream game type, even many projects being created for handhelds like the Nintendo DS and the Sony PSP.

True casual games (unlike Sony’s LittleBigPlanet that required far more development money and requires far more attention far more often from players than do traditional casual games) are, generally, focused in goals, simple in design, clever in gameplay, and elegant in imagery. Casual games are also typically developed on 3-6 month production cycles (generally closer to 3 months), and this kind of schedule functions, secondarily, as its own watch dog, “encouraging” developers to avoid many of the poor decisions and silly political distractions that easily-and-often bloat the production efforts of many other game types.

 

Having spent my career developing for almost every type of game hardware and nearly every type of game, both in the production trenches and on the management level, I would go as far as suggesting that casual game development may be the place to be, if, above all else, you really wish to make games that stick to their core goals and original design like glue. Mainstream, high-investment game development (in dollars spent and man hours worked) regularly involves creating large, saturated worlds (both single-player and multi-player), vehicles, characters, props, AI, networking, LAN lobbies, chat features, and multi-faceted graphic user interfaces, with many other unique moving parts across multiple development disciplines, during one project.

Casual games (which are also mainstream but under a different context) tighten the belt on almost every one of these elements, enforcing manageability out of necessity, and realistically acknowledging what is needed, first, versus what is wanted, second. In the general games industry, where there continues to be a global struggle to enforce better management and manageability of game products, the casual games sector has become a beacon of business practice hope.

 

The 800-pound gorilla of the games industry, commonly known as the entertainment software sector, could learn quite a bit from casual games development, in the vein of proper short- and long-term resource management. The managers in charge of 70-100+ person teams that are developing the latest FPS or MMO, regardless of platform, would take a more refined approach to those projects if they began their careers in a smaller capacity.

 

Furthermore, for me and other by-the-book game developers, I have never forgotten that video games, no matter the genre or type, were derived from board games, and, in turn, toys. A true test of a good game design is, of course, a paper version of that design, which, again, is a traditional extension of board games, and, in turn, casual games. It is amazing that no matter how hard the games industry (particularly the entertainment software sector) attempts to separate itself from its roots as board games and toys, the worm, as it were, turns game development right back to those same roots.

Casual game development is very much a revival-of-sorts, generating yet another form of dozens, even hundreds of historically-traditional games (from checkers to black jack to horse shoes). Casual games, as they are known today, are on course as a permanent reminder of from where all video games originally hail, and I expect casual games, through the collective efforts of companies like Zynga, Playfish, and Kongregate, to become a transcendent sector of the games industry for years to come. When all else fails, when stunning visuals with poor gameplay are no longer acceptable, and when the latest powerhouse game consoles are typically exposed as nothing without quality games, there will be casual games, quietly and innocently leading the way.

 

“In 300 years, when Evil returns . . . so shall we.” – The Mondoshawan in the “The Fifth Element."