Home History Blogs Portfolio FAQ Contact Terms Of Use
 
2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017
2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  2025  2026  2027
2028  2029  2030  2031  2032  2033  2034  2035  2036  2037
 
 
 
2008-2009 Offseason: Addition By Subtraction - Cowboys Ponder The Release Of T.O.
 
January 11, 2009 At 11:49 PM EST
By Eric M. Scharf

“Terrell Owens is an extremely talented player, an incredible physical specimen, and a great wide receiver.”

You hear everyone say it – from people within the Dallas Cowboys organization to the reporters and prognosticators throughout the sports world.

What is not to like about the abilities Terrell Owens brings to an NFL offense? His statistics over the past three regular seasons with the Cowboys (within an offense that included multiple viable receiving threats) were generally better than over 90% of the other pass catchers in the league.

In 2006, Terrell had 69 catches for 1,052 yards and 10 touchdowns while sharing most of the reception load with Terry Glenn and Jason Witten, over 15 of 16 games. That season represents the first opportunity for Tony Romo to start, about halfway through the season, as he stepped in for a fading Drew Bledsoe.
 
You can imagine what Terrell’s numbers might have been with a full season alongside a starting Romo (who has received all of the practice reps as well).

In 2007, Terrell had 81 catches for 1,355 yards and 15 touchdowns while sharing most of the reception load with Terry Glenn and Jason Witten, over 15 games. So far, this has been Terrell’s best season with the Cowboys and his first opportunity to play with Tony Romo for almost an entire season.
 
Ask anyone in the NFL and they will tell you the rapport between a starting QB and his star receiver(s) is core to their success. A successful pitch-and-catch routine that can occur between a QB and a receiver, who are unfamiliar with each other, happens oh-so-rarely.

In 2008, Terrell had 85 catches for 1,180 yards and 13 touchdowns over 15 games. This particular season was largely forgettable by the entire Cowboys organization and fans alike, and, yet, Terrell had more catches, with a reasonable yardage drop-off, and nearly as many touchdowns as the previous “What Could Have Been” 2007 season.
 
Terrell still had to share the available pass allotment with multiple receiving threats, but that is where the similarities stop. Romo went down after the first third of the season. Felix Jones went down about the same time and, after a few weeks of tinkering, was shut down and placed on injured reserve. Roy Williams (the would-be production replacement for Terry Glenn) arrived on the scene from Detroit with no practice and, really, no chance.
 
The offensive line imploded almost every other game. Brad Johnson’s rust turned into disastrous old age over night. The third QB was just as dreadful as Johnson. The back-ups, at all but one position (running back), played like back-ups. The offensive game plan, through all of this misery, seemed stuck in neutral, even with the return of Romo for the last handful of games. And, yet, Terrell still delivered most of the goods on his end.

Now, if you discount the unreasonable number of dropped passes over the past three years, the growing problem of being unable to fight off a jamming defender at the line of scrimmage, and the well-intentioned but poorly-timed comments on the status of the team’s offensive game plan, QB, and other star receiver, the tight end, then, people are correct, and Terrell is as good as his numbers indicate.

Success in today’s NFL, however, requires more than just raw numbers. You need to be able to gel with your teammates as well, even at the worst of times, because, at the best of times, with a team as talented as the Cowboys, you do not want to be left off of that bandwagon.

A lot of people, in general, are still awaiting some kind of transformation in Terrell, where he wakes up one morning and has become Michael Irvin. That kind of expectation has led to the current rumor that Terrell may be cut this off-season.

Experts and fans alike need to remind themselves of some general facts regarding T.O., pertaining specifically to his time with the Cowboys).

Terrell practices his butt off in preparation for games.  Terrell has mentored his other less-experienced receiver teammates in practice as well.
 
Terrell wants to be involved in as much of the game plans and game day plays as possible.  Terrell will get in his QB’s ear, and, eventually, his head, about receiving more and more passes.
 
Terrell will be satisfied with a productivity drop-off through play-calling, and increase in downfield blocking assignments, as long as someone else is getting the receiving job done and the Cowboys are winning.
 
Terrell will complain if he is sacrificing catches only to see other receivers drop them.  Terrell will complain if he is wide open and his QB sees him and does not respond.  Terrell will complain if he is wide open and his QB throws an inexcusable interception.
 
Terrell will complain and display the biggest set of “gator arms” you have ever seen when, for all intents and purposes, his QB has thrown a pass to him that will end in the collision of all collisions.  It was not so incredibly long ago that, as a dreaded 49er in a playoff game against the Packers, he caught a pass over the middle and just inside of the end zone, from Steve Young, that almost got him killed. Terrell hung on for dear life and lived to cry about it, too.
 
Terrell will complain, often and publicly, about an apparently stagnant offensive scheme, if he has already done so privately and professionally (as preferred by the team), and, in his estimation, nothing has changed . . . and losses continue to pile up.

While there are certainly similarities between what Michael Irvin brought to the Cowboys, in the past, and what Terrell Owens brings to the Cowboys in the present, there are a few notable differences that further contribute to this idea that Terrell may not be with the team much longer.

Michael was willing to sacrifice his body in return for one more chance to win . . . a game, a division, a conference championship, or a Super Bowl . . . as much for himself as it was for his teammates and the Cowboys organization.
 
Michael had that innate ability to command the respect of everyone within the organization (even when he was having his own off-the-field problems), because he would never throw anyone under the bus in such a team sport. Everyone knew he simply wanted to win all the time, win big, encourage his teammates when they performed, and give them a healthy kick in the pants whenever they fell short of the excellence everyone wanted and expected.
 
Michael had a QB, who, regardless of his eventual Hall of Fame induction, could and would stand up to Michael, command the same respect, and demand the same top-level performance from him. This just made the bond and respect Michael and his teammates had for each other that much stronger.
 
Michael had an Offensive Coordinator and Head Coach who encouraged Michael and his teammates to strive for perfection and continue to develop and hone the killer instinct, at every turn. Furthermore, his Head Coach, at the time, had known Michael his entire college career, and they had a mutual understanding and level of expectation that few player-coach relationships have ever experienced.

Terrell is far from perfect, however, the decision to keep or release him will have a lot less to do with any diminishing skills on his end. The focus of this potential decision involves the mental toughness of Terrell’s star offensive teammates, his Offensive Coordinator, and his Head Coach.

How would Terrell have accomplished with the strong-willed cast of coaches and players Michael had?

How would Michael, conversely, have accomplished with the current crop of coaches and players who are still attempting to find their identity as a team?

We will never know, and it is unfair to compare two similar players, two different teams, and two different eras, but, at the end of the day, the decision to cut or keep Terrell very well may come down to such a comparison.
 
And, if the decision to cut Terrell does come to pass, let us hope it does, in fact, result in a simple case of addition by subtraction, rather than subtraction of the drama while the problem remains.
 
We shall see. We always do.