Home History Blogs Portfolio FAQ Contact Terms Of Use
 
2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017
2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  2025  2026  2027
2028  2029  2030  2031  2032  2033  2034  2035  2036  2037
 
 
 
2009-2010 Regular Season: Postgame - Bucked From The Saddle
 
October 10, 2009 At 8:17 AM CST
By Eric M. Scharf
 
Regression Rather Than Improvement

This game was depressing to watch.

If it was disturbing, that would indicate the Cowboys were not quite aware of their circumstances, their surroundings, or how poorly they were playing.

Long after the grueling press sessions and the measured one-on-one interviews have ended – and everyone in the organization has returned safely to the semi-private confines of Valley Ranch – an assessment of the true positives and negatives are made clear for everyone to hear.

The Cowboys were generally expected to win a game against a Denver team that had a defense playing with more heart than talent and an offense that scared no one in the NFL.

The Cowboys were supposed to build upon the results of the Carolina game – bringing together a complete effort from offense, defense, and special teams.

Tony Romo was supposed to take a few more chances than his recent bus driver posturing would make you believe.

Tashard Choice was supposed to pick up any slack between an almost ready for prime time Marion Barber and an MIA Felix Jones.

The Cowboys cadre of receivers was supposed to continue improvements with route running, pass catching, and play making.

The offensive line was supposed to transfer some of that impressive run-blocking into renewed pass protection and fewer tripping penalties.

The offensive scheme was supposed to utilize more of the two tight end sets – providing extra protection for Romo, extra blocking for the running attack, and the ability to slide out for a swing pass or down the seam against overmatched linebackers.

The defense was supposed to improve line play and tighter secondary coverage with successful open-field tackling.

The Cowboys, in general, were supposed to attempt a number of things – as part of the weekly improvement their fans expect but rarely appear to receive. The phrase “it’s beginning to get old” is downright ancient when it comes to this year’s collection of talent – the core of which has been playing together for the past two to three years.

After what seemed like a breeze of a first quarter, the Cowboys’ offense was stuck in some kind of inter-dimensional quicksand until their final drive of the game. The Broncos, conversely, seemed quite content within that same quicksand – displaying the same offense no one else in the league appeared to fear, either.

The Broncos scored all of their points off of – or in part from – Cowboys turnovers. Kyle Orton was doing quite well throwing neither turnovers nor completions for much of the game. He was like a bus driver with training wheels, as far as game managers are concerned.

Romo was – for the second game in a row – attempting to play bus driver, too. I can certainly see how everyone in the organization would believe that the same approach would work for the second game in a row. After all, the Panthers were superior in every way to the Denver “Cakewalk Schedule” Broncos – or were they?

Romo and the rest of the offense looked about as confused as possible for three quarters of play against a defense that was clearly following a plan of attack. This was the first game in some time where none of Romo’s other teammates were blamed for any of his gaffes.

What was so unpredictable about the Broncos defense that prevented the Cowboys from making any adjustments for nearly three full quarters – after dominating for almost the entire first one?

The Cowboys – with their current talent – were supposed to show at least some improvement from the last game . . . rather than a whole lot of regression, the likes of which I have not seen for years.

Painful Memories Surface

There were elements of this game that were eerily similar to a miserable regular season game several years ago: the Cowboys 45-10 loss to the Green Bay Packers at Lambeau Field. The Cowboys and Aikman were nursing a 3-0 lead in the first half, capped by a punt return for a touchdown by Deion Sanders. The Cowboys defense was doing an admirable job keeping Favre and the potent Packers offense under wraps, and the Cowboys headed into halftime with a shaky 10-0 lead. You just knew “something wicked this way comes” at the start of the third quarter. The Cowboys had no chance – whether through their own mistakes or the Packers proper execution. The Cowboys were under a spell like Snow White, they were punch drunk, and they simply had no fight.

This game also reminded me of the entire 2000 season – Aikman’s final season in the NFL, where he played his brains out within the system and lost game after painful game . . . with a shell of a team. Every game seemed to be playing out in slow motion.

No Fooling The Fans

Sports fans are as passionate about sports as the teams for whom they cheer and celebrate – sometimes more than can be considered healthy. Sports fans, like all other people, however, are born and raised on the theory of Pavlov’s dog. If you experience an activity enough times, you come to expect a certain outcome or result.

A large portion of today’s sports fans are far more in-tune with what makes a particular sport tick than fans of decades ago. A number of these fans can no longer be simply described as overzealous big mouths with absolutely no clue. While many of these fans may never know what it is like to run at such incredible speeds, to run such incredible distances, to jump to such incredible heights, to be involved in such incredible physical collisions, or to perform under such incredible pressure in nationally televised games . . . when these fans see an obvious dud, there is no fooling them.

Quest For Fire

The Cowboys, for 2+ seasons, have had something systemically wrong with them. The Cowboys – as an organization – have not displayed the means to make do with the resources they have at their disposal. They do not seem to have an ounce of what it takes to reach down deep – deeper than pride alone – and emerge from the darkness with a blinding light. They do not seem to have that true fear of failure (referred to as “hunger” by others in professional sports) that compels creative thought, unique approaches, and ingenious solutions to truly vexing problems.

There are teams the Cowboys have faced over their history that were decimated by injuries and poor execution. Some of these teams were so in awe of the Cowboys mystique that they would literally just lay down like doormats. Other teams would show heart, pride, and fear of failure – putting up a valiant fight only to succumb to the typically healthier and superior Cowboys. Still other teams would simply state to anyone who was listening: “Not against our team. No way. No how. We are not going to give them an inch. They will have to drag our dead bodies off the grid iron before this day is done . . . and there will be more of us left standing than them.”

The Cowboys have been on a “quest for fire” since the beginning of the 2007 season.

How You Lose - Not How Many Losses

I hope no one within the Cowboys players or the fans outside of it have forgotten the 2007 playoff loss to the Giants or the 2008 season ending and humiliating loss to the Eagles. The playoff loss was not important, nor was the season ending loss. The losses were not the issue. They way the losses occurred were and remain the issue.

T.O. – with his double digit touchdown total and untimely, ego-bruising comments – is no longer here. Terry Glen – with his former speed and excellent hands as well as his current bum knee – is no longer here. Their talent was unquestioned, but their absence is not the issue.

The Cowboys players do not have a voice of determination and strength to which they can turn during times of great turmoil. Jerry Jones can take away their paychecks one at a time or all at once by cutting every player on the roster. This fact does not seem to amount to a hill of beans to his players – not even in this economy.

Wade Phillips – no matter what he says publicly – has been reduced to a soft-spoken, head-shaking defensive coordinator posing as a head coach. Cowboys’ fans know he means well, has the very best of intentions, and wants his team to win in the worst way, but continuing to respond to concerns with “we just continue to work hard,” is wearing thinner than gauze in front of an oncoming Mack truck. Fans want to know and see that “we are working hard at a change in our approach in practice and our scheme during games.” Otherwise, so far, everything looks the same and sounds the same. “Same as it ever was, same as it ever was” – David Byrnes of the Talking Heads.

Jason Garrett – who says very little publicly – remains a complete mystery to everyone who has not coached or played pro football with him. He is either an offensive genius who has been stuck with players who do not know how to read a playbook . . . or he is a struggling offensive specialist who does not know how to properly educate and utilize his players – either when they are at full strength or when they are missing a few pieces to the point-scoring puzzle. The question continues to be asked, from sea to shining sea: “Who came first – the troubled offensive coordinator or the players who have trouble learning?"
 
Phillips and Garrett know the score - even with everything Jerry Jones has been thus far willing to absorb.  They are aware enough to know that Jerry cares equally about the team and his own source(s) of personal embarrassment.  If the season ends on an inconsistent or bad note, Jerry will kick Phillips's passive approach and Garrett's misplaced brilliance to the curb . . . and Cowboys nation will be asked to embrace another round of "CQC:  Catch A Qualified Coach."

No More Role-Playing

Any fan of any pro sports star ideally wants that star to be perfect in every possible way. Fans of Romo are no different, but a fan – just like a star – can want something too badly.

Romo was not born or wired to be a bus driver, try as he might. Romo was not born or wired to be a complete touchdown machine without his share of mistakes. Romo was, however, born to be something of a Brett Favre / Fran Tarkenton hybrid – with the near insane gun slinger mentality of Favre and the supreme escapability of Tarkenton. It is pure coincidence, however, that both of the stars he has directly / indirectly emulated are affiliated with the Vikings.

I had been wondering – like all fans – to where the 2007 Romo had disappeared, and for one play in the 4th quarter, he magically reappeared for a brief moment, like a legendary unicorn. It was 4th down, and somebody – anybody – needed to make an offensive play for the Cowboys. No sooner was the ball snapped to Romo than his offensive line was crumbling around him. He stepped up in the pocket, he zigged, he zagged, and right before he was about to consumed by Broncos defenders, he gently made a crisp short pass – right on the money and right in stride – to Sam Hurd, who raced down the field deep inside Denver territory. What occurred after that play was simply more of the garbage fans have been fed this season.

People – within and external to the Cowboys organization – should stop insisting that Romo remains a captive audience to the play of his offensive line. His offensive line teammates – try as they might – have only excelled at run-blocking this season. Romo owes no such allegiance to those players who would indirectly conspire to get him killed. While they continue to attempt improvements towards protecting the most important player on their side of the football, Romo should be free to emulate Fran Tarkenton as often as necessary. And that is the key.

Romo’s mistakes come from a lack of opportunities within the current offensive system he is asked to run. His escapability – if encouraged – creates those missing opportunities, especially for a few of his poor route running receivers. If – outside of Witten, Crayton, and possibly Williams – Romo’s receivers cannot run crisp routes or pay attention soon enough to truncate those routes, then, Romo needs to be free to butcher his offensive line as often as possible.

The offensive line need not worry about how badly they will look because, if they are missing blocking assignments and tripping opponents, Romo will be doing them a favor, not hanging them out to dry. After all, someone should tell Flozell Adams that a trip to the pro bowl is not meant to be taken literally.

Something Cooking In Kansas City

There is going to be some great barbeque this Sunday in KC while the Cowboys play the Chiefs. It is purely up the Cowboys whether or not they are part of the food being served.

Every time my daughter gets reprimanded for doing something wrong (fighting with her younger brother), I invoke the line from the animated movie, Iron Giant: “You are who you choose to be.”

Romo is not Peyton Manning, nor does he need to be, but he should feel free to revert to his 2007 tendencies . . . especially without the services of Felix Jones and Roy "KC Ain't Cookin' My Ribs" Williams. Romo, under these circumstances, should feel encouraged to take the approach of “If it’s broke, go fix it.”

The Cowboys defense can plan all they want for keeping the Chief’s Larry Johnson under wraps, but without being able to wrap up at the point of contact, they might as well have just remained in Denver. The players know better. The players know they must fight the desire to over-pursue.

They also know that they cannot simply tackle towards success, either – not with Anthony Spencer wearing cooking oil on his gloves. They need to catch what is thrown to them. The Cowboys need to be on the eating end of the BBQ, not the cooking end.

They can beat the Chiefs, just as they could have and should have beaten the Broncos. The Cowboys, hopefully, have found their true identities in this week’s practice rather than saving that chore for Sunday’s game. Eat or be eaten.
 
We shall see. We always do.