Home Updates History Blogs Portfolio FAQ Contact Terms Of Use
 
2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017
2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  2025  2026  2027
2028  2029  2030  2031  2032  2033  2034  2035  2036  2037
 
 
 
2008-2009 Regular Season: Postgame - Is It Unfair To Compare Romo To Aikman?
 
September 29, 2008 At 5:21 PM EST
By Eric M. Scharf

"People" like to say it is unfair to compare Tony Romo to Troy Aikman when Tony is only a few years into his career, but the comparison is less about raw talent and more about how Romo has shown no leadership skills, nor a desire to lead (at least when he is front of national TV cameras).
 
Fans used to be irate at how well Aikman kept his composure during the post-game locker room interviews. He was totally cool. Nothing could rattle him while in the face of the word-bending media. Everyone’s perception of Aikman changed, however, once everyone began to see tidbits of video footage, here and there, of him chewing out his teammates before, during, and after plays, and especially on the sideline for screwing up, even a little bit.
 
We all knew, under no uncertain terms and to my perfectionist delight, that Troy Aikman meant business, and he had no problem telling his teammates when they screwed the pooch, even on the smallest details. And, as a direct result of his pursuit of perfection in everything he did on the field, we had been spoiled by an accurate, neat-freak of an all-star quarterback, even on his bad days.
 
You always knew he was going to deliver as perfectly as he could, and, if he could not, he was going to kill himself to correct the mistakes if at all possible (Watch a replay of the 1994 NFC Championship Game against the 49ers, that we should have won but where he gift-wrapped 3 straight interceptions on our first 3 possessions).

Now, Romo, he, at least on national TV, does not appear to be the details guy Aikman was, and, to be clear, still is. Romo, on the other hand, whether on the field, on the sideline, before the play, or after the play, does not seem the least bit interested in constructively calling out any of his teammates (even in a "we did / did not" fashion) for a lousy effort on a particular play or series.
 
Could it be that he feels he has no place to do so, because of his own mistakes? Maybe this is the case. That never stopped Aikman, however, from demanding the most of his teammates, even during his first few painful years in the NFL. Romo needs to acknowledge, to himself, that questions about his desire to win at all costs will continue to arise until he either becomes invincible to the taunts or publicly goes after his teammates.
 
No one will dispute that Romo has the talent to be a star quarterback in the NFL, but, due to the nature of the position he plays, he needs the commanding presence to go with it. I have determined, however, that Romo believes he has a choice.
 
Neither Romo, nor any other starting QB in the NFL has such a choice (unless it involves quitting on his big contract, the owner who signed him to it, the coaches who have invested so much time in his maturation, and the teammates who rely on him to play the ultimate star position in a way that only Romo can). The position has bare minimum requirements that must be achieved, on a regular basis.

If Romo thinks he does not owe his leaderless team, his too-cool-for-TV coaching staff, his check-writing team owner, or his massive fan base a personality makeover (which is unfair to him, but, at the very least, an effort towards leadership), then, that is his organization-dooming decision.
 
This team is begging for someone to stand up and take charge, and Romo should be one of at least three people to do so (one for each of the core groups that make up an NFL football team: offense, defense, and special teams). These otherwise-unnecessary questions will continue to irritate his leaderless team, his too-cool-for-TV coaching staff, his check-writing team owner, and his massive fan base. Everyone in the world knows better, Aikman certainly knows better, and Romo does, too.

Romo, from all accounts, is an incredibly selfless person but, leadership inaction, from a position associated with leadership, lends itself to selfishness in the eyes of someone (a fan or teammate) looking in from the outside, whether intended or not.
 
No matter how wonderful a person Romo may be, his fans simply will not let go of the leadership question, unfortunately, even if a great leader is found elsewhere on the team. If not Romo, who else, indeed?
 
We shall see. We always do.