Home Updates History Blogs Portfolio FAQ Contact Terms Of Use
 
2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017
2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  2025  2026  2027
2028  2029  2030  2031  2032  2033  2034  2035  2036  2037
 
 
 
2010-2011 Regular Season: From Shredded To Swiss?
 
November 6, 2010  At 11:15 PM CST
By Eric M. Scharf


The Dallas Cowboys continued their consistent course of making their opponents look better than necessary last Sunday.

The Cowboys showed up against the Jaguars with a thimble-full of inspiration and another mountain of mistakes.

The Cowboys made sure to let Jacksonville know that tips were not going out of style anytime soon in Dallas. While a nice line would have been one-eth by bar, two-eth by restaurant, three-eth by stadium vendor, and four-eth by skybox server, the Cowboys simply had no luck on their side . . . with three more tipped interceptions and one full-blown red-blooded interception to the wrong guy.

The Cowboys secondary was a sieve – making the otherwise pedestrian David Garrard look like a rock star with a near-perfect quarterback rating to end the game.

The Cowboys evidently expected playtime with puddy tat, and they gagged on a hairball instead – getting shredded for seeking a soft opponent.

Sunday has become sinister for the Cowboys, and the next one has just stepped up to home plate – with Green Bay looking to know Dallas right out of Lambeau Field.

Inevitable But Impossibly Illogical

The Dallas Cowboys began the season with such high hopes – to at least reach the same depth of playoff success as last year and possibly more. No one could have foreseen such an incredible drop-off in positive production and righteous results.
 
 
No one could have expected such a season-long fright fest. No one could have expected something this scary . . . and not immediately figured the failing team was the Oakland Raiders. While the boys in blue are truly blue, look who's laughing now in silver and black – and not looking back?
 
 
The Dallas Cowboys will have a new coaching staff next season – barring a mammoth miracle. Nine straight wins and major choke jobs by division rivals, indeed.

The conditions contributing to this dead horse determination are clear, but the mental state of the participants remains a complete mystery.

The Cowboys – in general – have played poorly for all but one and a half games of the 2010 season. Poor player performance – fair or not – is tied to the coaches coordinating the calls.

The coaches are physically confined to the sidelines unless they want to incur a delay of game penalty . . . or they need to tackle an oblivious line judge and shove their red challenge flag down his throat before a play is run.

The coaches spend a week at a time – and sometimes less – drawing up game plans focused on a carefully measured mix of their players’ greatest strengths and their opponent’s weaknesses.

The coaches – in general – call plays designed to give their players the best opportunities to systemically succeed.

Systemic success is merely the foundation of what a coaching staff hopes to achieve – with the rest being accomplished through the raw and refined physical talents allegedly existing within each of their players.

Systemic success stops where YAC (yards after catch) begins, and YAC is where those physical skills are on full demonstration – outrunning opponents or making them miss.

The coaches – during the week leading up to each game – are counting on their players to have paid attention in practice, team meetings, and studied the playbook on the own recognizance.

The coaches are obligated to make as reasonably certain as possible that their players are indeed ready and willing to successfully execute each game day plan . . . rather than terminally execute themselves through poor preparation.

The players are responsible for executing the coaching staff’s system.

The coaching staff’s system is the meat of game day preparation – fundamentals notwithstanding (except in the case of the 2010 Cowboys).

The players are responsible for producing the gravy to that meat – anything above and beyond systemic production. YAC, blah, and all that. Otherwise, a play designed to be a 10 yard "button-hook" will be exactly that as long as the receiver is able to beat his defender to the pre-determined spot on the field.
 
Are the players responsible for poor play calls? No – and yet the players are still responsible for making "something from nothing" on broken plays . . . or making some level of pre-snap adjustments to make up for wrong personnel packages.
 
Are the players responsible for wrong personnel packages? No – and yet the players are still responsible for making "something from nothing" with whomever is on the field. Assuming that an offensive tackle does not suddenly find himself flanked at wide receiver, the players are still responsible for making "something from nothing."
 
Have the Cowboys coaches made a variety of poor decisions? Yes.
 
Have the Cowboys coaches overestimated what their players can actually execute? Outside of Gerald Sensabaugh being inexcusably left out at cornerback in the red zone against the Giants - No. And . . . if Sensabaugh was not meant to be out there, why did he or Bradie James or Keith Brooking not call an immediate timeout? Bradie and Brooking are normally far more on the ball with catching such horrific formation problems.
 
Wade never attempted to call a timeout – and his son still is a quality control coach for the Cowboys, if memory serves – so he must have either been sadistically serious in leaving Sensabaugh on a lonely island against a player who was certain to beat him . . . or Wade had no alternative with an injured Terence Newman. I hear Orlando Scandrick is now officially listed on the Cowboys' depth chart as "No Alternative" . . . but I digress.
 
The blame game can ping pong back and forth between coaches and players deeper and longer than most casual fans are aware – but the coaches are the ultimate target when the dust settles at the conclusion of every game and every season. They control preparation for game day, they control the play selection on game day – unless they have Peyton "Detail King" Manning at quarterback – and they control the personnel packages.
 
Wade Phillips, Jason Garrett, and Joe DeCamillis – as well as their support staff – wear invisible targets on their Cowboys gear every day . . . and they rely upon their players to make their best calls even better and the poor calls good. The coaches play a game of chance with their available resources for every game.

While it is inevitable the Cowboys will have a new coaching staff in place next year, it is impossibly illogical to determine how much of this year’s mess is on the coaches’ prep and play-calling . . . and how much is on the players’ professionalism.

Keith Brooking – as expected – continues to stand up for his long-time coach and, as a result, most fans consider him a homer.

What if Brooking really is telling the truth? He has been a standup guy for his entire career.

What if the players really are suffering from an incredible mental meltdown while – in general – playing for the same coaches and within the same four year old system?

When the players revolt against the system, it results in really revolting play on the field, which is really revolting for rabid red-eyed fans to watch. When faced with players who are stuck in neutral, if the coaches do not have the mental makeup to repurpose their plays and players for which those plays were designed, it simply leads down a road to nowhere . . . and change.

 
 
It is impossibly illogical that so many returning and talented starters from last season’s successful playoff team could have become so mentally incapable in the very same system – on offense, defense, and special teams.

It is impossibly illogical to figure out how Jerry Jones will go about fixing a problem that may very well require rebuilding both the coaching staff and huge pieces of the roster.

It seems inevitable but impossibly illogical.

A Bit Drafty In The War Room

While the 2010 Cowboys began the season with grandiose goals, they were attempting to achieve those accolades with delinquent depth.

The Cowboys clearly are not one of those teams who can afford to sacrifice or waste draft picks – even if they are convinced such players (Tim Tebow, anyone?) would struggle to crack a talented starting roster.

The Cowboys draft benefitted – in general – during the years of Landry, Johnson, and Parcells. A spotty drafting record is present for “the forgettable remainder.”

Any armchair quarterback understands that draft picks can no longer be wasted. Value can and should be found at each selection spot. If at first value does not exist at your spot with "the best available player," trade down and try, try again.
 
The best available player has to be an absolute useless dog – or you are seeking less expensive talent – for you to want to trade out of that spot. If you cannot find a blockbuster starter, you can always find a role player – as teams are comprised of both.

The deeper the Cowboys 1-6 record sinks, the deeper the Cowboys will have to make their roster in the off-season . . . whether or not they have a draft deity on the payroll.

McCann Do And Must Do

Bryan McCann needs to be the man that can – being signed to the 53-man roster in support of an ailing Terence Newman and an unavailable Owusu-Ansah at kick returner / safety.

Cowboys fans can only hope McCann is one of those rookies who genuinely appreciates the opportunities he may be given.

The Cowboys struggling secondary will continue to be challenged for the rest of the season – by Green Bay tomorrow and any remaining 2010 foes armed with better than average receivers.

McCann and any of other raw fill-ins must do to show they can do.

The People’s Choice

Jerry Jones, Wade, and Jason should be thrilled they were not susceptible to any of the recent congressional elections . . . for any of their collective decisions.

The Cowboys transparent running game continues to be in desperate need of a spark – and the passing game desperately needs and deserves a bit of rushing bedrock, as well.

While the Cowboys offensive line continues to be highly offensive when it comes to run-blocking, a good and reliable running back has the ability to make defenders miss.

Marion the Barbarian has continued to struggle – even in short yardage – and Felix the Cat has continued to have minimal luck bursting out of the blocks.

Marion has been less of a bruiser and Felix has been less of a speedster – with neither back breaking many tackles nor manufacturing much yardage on their own.

Tashard Choice is the solution – or the next solution.

 
Memories of his 2008 tour of duty are not so old that fans do not remember how well he performed as the starter in place of the Booboo Barbarian and the declawed Cat.

Tashard Choice is the solution – and he should be given the chance to start . . . yes, all of a sudden.

While Tashard is not Marcus Allen and Jerry Jones is not Al Davis (or is he?), Tashard is being made to ride the pine unnecessarily. Al Davis made Allen languish on the Raiders bench for at least two years – while still in the prime of his brilliant career – and the Raiders only suffered for it.

Tashard has done nothing wrong – outside of one fumble – to deserve the lack of playing time through which he has endured with his head held high for much of this season.

If Tashard was the next coming of Curvin Richards, his extensive bench time would be understandable, but Tashard is no former rushing flunky.

Tashard Choice is the solution – and he requires less of the Cowboys suffering offensive linemen than do his backfield mates.

Tashard Choice is the solution – and he can make people miss with good speed, rushing or catching out of the backfield, and when operating from the really rare Razorback.

Tashard Choice is the solution – and he is the People’s Choice.

Jerry, Wade, and Jason appear to be aware this could be the case, but they will never know for sure unless they give Tashard another chance to start.

If Tashard proves to be the right choice, the Cowboys brass will look brilliant. If Tashard proves to be a poor choice, they will not have to hear another word about him from anyone.

It is their choice and – with a 1-6 record – Tashard Choice is ready to be chosen.

Inspiration Challenged

Players – in any major professional sport – attempt to deliver the goods at five different levels of inspiration:

1 – Love of the game: they could almost play for free.

2 – Love of the coach: they cannot envision playing for any other coach or in any other system.

3 – Love of the paycheck: they show up to play reasonably well to ensure the green never gets lean.

4 – Love of the career: they have already had their big paydays, and they are more interested in stretching the twilight of their career – gravy training with as many winners for as many winning opportunities as possible (former Oakland Raiders linebacker Matt Millen comes to mind).

5 – Love of the Twilight Zone – where they are still in the prime of their career but seem lost mentally and challenged to unearth even the smallest amount of inspiration.

 
While the Cowboys certainly qualify for the lowest rung of inspiration, it remains a major mystery as to why their brains function so abnormally on game day.

Who Moved My Cheese?

The Cowboys arrive at Lambeau Field tomorrow with about as much positive consistency as “Easy Cheese.”

They were shredded by Jacksonville last week and – after a week of healing up – the Cowboys could be shot to Swiss cheese or pounded to parmesan by game’s end in the land of Lombardi.

The Cowboys face a Green Bay Packers team that – aside from a tough win against the New York Jets – has looked beatable for most of the season. Green Bay has a good passing game (when their offensive line is healthy), they have an average rushing game, and their defensive secondary is – once again – dinged up.

The Cowboys – once again – have enough physical talent on their side of the ball to win this game. Did they develop enough mental maturity during their week of practice to put that physical talent to good use? Will they begin executing their plays or continue mercilessly executing their coaches?
 
"If I only had a brain," said the scarecrow. Do the Cowboys wish they had brains – or do they believe ignorance is bliss when you are playing poorly?

Has Roy Williams finally gone over the edge – catching most of the passes thrown his way AND insisting on a nine game winning streak? Fans would love it, but they are not that fickle – and they have no interest in being teased again . . . and again.
 
Are the Cowboys just going to continue playing out the string with a “Love of the Twilight Zone?”

Do Cowboys fans want to continue seeing something really scary every week?

Can the Cowboys move Green Bay’s cheese clear out of Lambeau Field?

We shall see. We always do.